We have a lot of open bugs that can probably be closed; either they've already been fixed or they no longer apply to the current version of pulp. To help deal with this, a monthly meeting has been proposed to "triage" old bugs. Before considering a re-triage of these old bugs, it seems like it might be useful to do an "inquisition" (credit to mhrivnak for the term) and closing out bugs that are obviously no longer useful.
Unfortunately, there are 970 open bugs in Redmine at the time I'm writing this, so even if we commit to doing 100 bugs in one of these monthly sessions, it'll be 10 months before we've gotten through that backlog, and new bugs will be coming in all the while. I think it's a really good idea to go through all of these, but we need to come up with a sort of litmus test to Yea/Nay the closing of issues that we can apply to our backlog to make cleaning these issues out less painful. Unfortunately, after looking at this for a little while, nothing is really popping out at me as a way to make the process easy, or easy to distribute. Any ideas?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
