we had the issues you mentioned with 2.8.3, updated to 2.8.4 and so far (+/- 1 month I guess) is working smooth.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:57 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I am looking for recommendations on what release of Pulp is recommended > for production deployments. > > We have been running Pulp 2.3 in production for the past year and are > currently building out new production infrastructure to deploy our new > production Pulp environment on top of. > > We planned to deploy the latest stable release of Pulp which at the time > was Pulp version 2.8.3. > > We have Pulp 2.8.3 running on the new infra and are currently dealing with > various pulp tasks hanging with State: Waiting and Start Time: Unstarted > > I've noticed that the Katello project has recently upgraded their stable > release (3.0 currently) to use Pulp 2.8.4 packages located here: > > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/releases/yum/3.0/pulp/el7/x86_64/ > > And previously Pulp 2.6 was used as the stable packages for Katello > (skipping Pulp 2.7 altogether). > > For production deployments is Pulp 2.8.x the recommended release to use, > or should people be deploying Pulp 2.9.x in prod, or just skip Pulp 2.9.x > and use for devel environments only? > > Hopefully this question makes sense to you. It would be nice if the Pulp > project had some sort of LTS release (Long Term Support) to help guide > users to the most stable branch of development. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
