I am not sure why we decided to postpone this issue till Pulp 3, but it seems like an annoying bug to deal with on the 2 line. Would changing this behavior be a backwards incompatible change?
-Dennis On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Jason B. Nance <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I was wondering if there is a chance to get https://pulp.plan.io/issues/ > 2588 re-prioritized. It is currently set for Pulp 3, but this bug can be > hit fairly often when syncing a product that has a lot of mirrors (such as > CentOS) and when it is triggered it is non-trivial (IMO) to get things > smoothed out again. > > Thanks for the consideration, > > j > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
