Performance serving content is probably not optimal right now, simply because it's one of the hardest things to properly measure, and we haven't had time to do so. This is really helpful information to have because it confirms that we definitely do need to put in some work to improve things. We definitely don't want to be slower than Pulp 2 :)
If you could file an issue with all the data you have available, that would be great. On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 9:15 AM Winberg Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > I managed to get better performance by doing the following changes: > > > > - Increasing apache parameters 'ServerLimit' and 'MaxRequestWorkers'. > This was suggested from warning in the apache error logs which I had > missed. > - Increasing aiohttpd workers for the pulpcore-content service from 2 > to 6. Not sure what effect if any this has. > > > Not sure which measure had effect or if it is a combination, but things > seem to run pretty smoothly now without any errors. Still not quite as fast > as with pulp2, so if anyone has any tips I'll gladly accept them. > > > //Adam > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> on > behalf of Winberg Adam <[email protected]> > *Sent:* 20 January 2021 15:38 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Pulp-list] very slow yum runs > > > Hello, > > > we have been using a pulp2 installation serving yum repos to ~ 1200 > clients. Yesterday I went live with a pulp3 installation and client yum > runs was very slow. I mean timeout-slow, grinding our puppet runs to a halt > and forcing me to revert back to our pulp2 instance. > > > Pulp3 is behind a apache reverse proxy, and I'm seeing errors like: > > AH01102: error reading status line from remote server 127.0.0.1:24816 > > > There is no shortage of cpu/ram on the server. Pulp is connected to a > remote postgresql server. > > > Using rpm based installation on RHEL8 with > > python3-pulp-rpm-3.7.0-1.el8.noarch > python3-pulpcore-3.7.3-1.el8.noarch > > Anyone recognize this problem, is there some basic tuning that I have > missed? > > > Regards > > Adam > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
