Yesterday at open floor, we discussed decommissioning pulp-dev list in favor of of using Github Discussions[0] for developer discussions.
If there are no objections, I plan to decommission the pulp-dev list next week. [0] https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions David On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 11:01 AM Brian Bouterse <bmbou...@redhat.com> wrote: > I did this also for the pulpcore meeting: > https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/8 > > My format was a little different, but the same idea. > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:13 AM Grant Gainey <ggai...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:40 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Based on feedback, I've moved discussions to its own repo: >>> https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions. >>> >> >> Brillliant! >> >> One discovery I made this week - for 'Meetings' threads that exist to >> have meeting-minutes posted, the first entry should be a description of >> what the meeting you're recording is for, and each set of minutes should be >> a comment. This lets the reader sort by "Newest" and get >> most-recent-minutes-first.The initial message in a discussion is always at >> the top, no matter how you sort - so if it's your first meeting-minutes, >> they'll always be first. >> >> I redid the katello/pulp and community/pulp integration >> discussion-threads (in their new location) in light of this, apologies to >> anyone who got some notification-spam as a result this morning. >> >> - https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/7 >> - https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/4 >> >> G >> >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 1:49 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We've heard from the community about the amount of friction involved in >>>> getting help with Pulp and one of the areas I think we could improve is >>>> user communications. We currently run two mailing lists: pulp-list and >>>> pulp-dev. >>>> >>>> At today's open floor meeting, we talked about using Github's new >>>> Discussions feature[0] to host these conversations instead. I've set up a >>>> Discussion against pulpcore[1] for us to try but here's also an example of >>>> a project that has a lot of threads[2]. >>>> >>>> I think the consensus was that we'd just keep pulpcore as our one and >>>> only Github Discussions instance, which would serve as a replacement for >>>> pulp-list and pulp-dev. I'd propose that we try this out for a bit and >>>> eventually decommission our mailing lists. >>>> >>>> [0] https://docs.github.com/en/discussions >>>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/discussions >>>> [2] https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-list mailing list >>> Pulp-list@redhat.com >>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >> >> >> >> -- >> Grant Gainey >> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> pulp-...@redhat.com >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list