https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80770
--- Comment #2 from [email protected] --- (In reply to comment #1) > any reason not using line playback volume of your onboard sound card or > analog input monitor of your oxygen mixer instead of the software loopback > which have high latency at least one capture period and one plpayback > period ? Yes, there's a reason that I'm using PulseAudio's loopback module instead of the ALSA monitor, directly. That doesn't have anything to do with this bug, though. Since I last commented, I was able to reduce the 'Sink Latency' (and the module-loopback 'buffer latency') dramatically by correcting my PulseAudio default fragment size from the default 25 down to a more suitable 3. Although the 'Buffer Latency' value is no longer ~200ms, which defeats my theory that module-loopback always uses the recorded default value of 200ms, the latencies are still exactly the same regardless of whether I supply latency_msec=1 or latency_msec=2000. I'm not sure of exactly how module-loopback settles on its latency, but it still appears that the latency_msec option is ignored, as far as I can tell. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ pulseaudio-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-bugs
