https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84585
--- Comment #27 from Alessandro Ferri <[email protected]> --- Dear Raymond, the same failed error is present in both pulseaudio verbose log with Kernell 3.12.25 and 3.12.28, in the same situations. Do you think this is to create the bug? Kernel 3.12.25 1) ( 1.321| 0.001) I: [pulseaudio] (alsa-lib)pcm_hw.c: SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_HW_PARAMS failed (-22) ( 1.322| 0.001) D: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c: Set buffer size first (to 88200 samples), period size second (to 88200 samples). 2) ( 9.113| 0.001) I: [alsa-sink] (alsa-lib)pcm_hw.c: SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_HW_PARAMS failed (-22) ( 9.115| 0.001) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-util.c: Set buffer size first (to 88200 samples), period size second (to 44100 samples). Kernel 3.12.28 1) ( 1.217| 0.001) I: [pulseaudio] (alsa-lib)pcm_hw.c: SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_HW_PARAMS failed (-22) ( 1.219| 0.001) D: [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c: Set buffer size first (to 88200 samples), period size second (to 88200 samples). 2) ( 9.358| 0.001) I: [alsa-sink] (alsa-lib)pcm_hw.c: SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_HW_PARAMS failed (-22) ( 9.359| 0.001) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-util.c: Set buffer size first (to 88200 samples), period size second (to 44100 samples). (In reply to Raymond from comment #26) > (alsa-lib)pcm_hw.c: SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_HW_PARAMS failed (-22) > > > > do the driver has enough constraints to finalize the parameters when > pulseaudio only set maximum buffer size? > > > do this mean it support Non integer (e.g.3.7 ) periods per buffer since > there is no constraint > > snd_pcm_hw_constraint_integer(runtime, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_PERIODS); > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/commit/src/modules/alsa/ > alsa-util.c?id=3c73e2130fd65e147c487b0b84c1a8b6a8afa04c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ pulseaudio-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-bugs
