https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87002
--- Comment #17 from Mario Sanchez Prada <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Henningsson from comment #16) > [...] > Well, it's a hack. And the hackier, the more likely we regress some other > use case. Agreed. I never thought of that as a solution but more as an experiment, hopefully able to spark some discussion. Seems it worked, pretty nicely from that pov :) Anyway, I'm building PA again enabling the unit tests, to at least check whether I'm regressing something obvious.. > I'm more thinking that maybe one could initialize the port availability > earlier, even before pa_card_new, using the > pa_device_port_new_data_set_available function. Then we could act > accordingly already in the callback in 1). If that was possible, I think it would be awesome, I think that could simplify things a lot. Still, if I understand things correctly, we still could not revert the patch for bug 73375, even if we do that, as the sinks/sources would not be initialized at that point, but in init_profile. Does that make sense at all? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ pulseaudio-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-bugs
