https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93651
--- Comment #8 from Tanu Kaskinen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tom Yan from comment #7) > Well yes, but I don't suppose keep trying and failing on things doesn't > exist is an efficient way, even if assume it's not bugged? Shouldn't there > be faster way to filter out what's on the "list" does not exist first? Failing due to non-exitent device should be very fast. If there is a faster way, patches are welcome to improve the code, but the speed gains will be rather minimal in any case. I expect your delays to be caused by devices that actually exist. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ pulseaudio-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-bugs
