https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94971
nw9165-3...@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nev...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from nw9165-3...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to Alexander E. Patrakov from comment #4)
> What I am saying is that we should provide, to
> users of simple active speakers, the functionality equivalent to that of a
> high-end receiver, not to that of a Windows driver.
Okay, I see, that sounds good. But would it also allow me to do such simple
things as to lowering the bass a bit as described in the previous post for
example?
> But again, that's just my opinion, and if anyone sends patches that fix the
> equalizer, I promise to review them.
Would there be any chance that fixing the equalizer or implementing high-end AV
receiver audio correction into PulseAudio could be made a higher priority on
the list of things to do for the PulseAudio maintainers?
Regards(In reply to Jason Newton from comment #5)
> I believe we
> still need to address the people who are too poor or lazy to get a
> microphone and do this setup, and also for devices like earphones and
> laptop/tablet speakers as well - since they don't have a fixed location of
> operation. Equalizers do the next best job to DRC in a stationary setup,
> otherwise they may be the only common method. But there is no computation
> of the filter coefficients - you fiddle with it till your happy, and that is
> inexact and error prone, unfortunately. That's also why you need a real
> time UI for the bands or finding good settings takes far longer.
Fully agreeing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug._______________________________________________
pulseaudio-bugs mailing list
pulseaudio-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-bugs
