On Friday 26 April 2019 12:06:08 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 19:03 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 April 2019 18:54:05 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Thursday 25 April 2019 18:51:49 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 25 April 2019 19:43:28 Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > > > > Hi Pali,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:42 PM Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> > > > > <luiz.de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Pali,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:35 PM Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday 25 April 2019 13:28:16 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thursday 25 April 2019 14:19:15 Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > > > > > > > > These seems to work great, I can even switch on the fly the 
> > > > > > > > > profiles
> > > > > > > > > and after a short delay it switches without a problem, there 
> > > > > > > > > is one
> > > > > > > > > issue related to reconnecting though:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > https://gist.github.com/Vudentz/40f10e85fb860083958edae67093f016
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > With BlueZ remembering the last used endpoint (aptX) it seems 
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > policy ignores that and reverts to highest priority (SBC UHQ),
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Relevant lines:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > D: [lt-pulseaudio] bluez5-util.c: Transport 
> > > > > > > /org/bluez/hci0/dev_94_20_53_2E_08_CE/sep5/fd26 available for 
> > > > > > > profile a2dp_sink_aptx
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > D: [lt-pulseaudio] card.c: a2dp_sink_aptx availability unknown
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > D: [lt-pulseaudio] card.c: off availability yes
> > > > > > > I: [lt-pulseaudio] card.c: bluez_card.94_20_53_2E_08_CE: 
> > > > > > > active_profile: a2dp_sink_sbc_uhq2
> > > > > > > D: [lt-pulseaudio] module-bluetooth-policy.c: Looking for A2DP 
> > > > > > > profile activated by bluez for card bluez_card.94_20_53_2E_08_CE
> > > > > > > I: [lt-pulseaudio] card.c: Created 5 
> > > > > > > "bluez_card.94_20_53_2E_08_CE"
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > We got information that sep5 is activated with fd26 and it 
> > > > > > > corespondent
> > > > > > > to profile a2dp_sink_aptx. And on next lines we see that profile 
> > > > > > > has
> > > > > > > unknown availability -- which means that it is possible to switch 
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > that codec/profile, but it is not activated yet. On next lines we 
> > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > that module-bluetooth-policy is trying to find "a2dp_*" which has
> > > > > > > availability "on", but there is no one. So initial profile stay
> > > > > > > a2dp_sink_sbc_uhq2 which was chosen as default by card.c.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > So problem is why a2dp_sink_aptx profile has unknown availability 
> > > > > > > even
> > > > > > > it is activated? It should have "on" availability. And then policy
> > > > > > > choose it as initial.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Right, looks like the state is not correct since it has a fd already
> > > > > > it should have been marked available.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Problem seems to be that we need to set the transport state to playing
> > > > > since we introduce the following code:
> > > > > 
> > > > >     if (cp->available == PA_AVAILABLE_NO &&
> > > > > u->support_a2dp_codec_switch && pa_bluetooth_profile_is_a2dp(profile))
> > > > >         cp->available = PA_AVAILABLE_UNKNOWN;
> > > > > 
> > > > > That means every A2DP profile will be set to unknown including even if
> > > > > they have no transport yet
> > > > 
> > > > That is truth. But if there is a transport then availability is YES.
> > > > 
> > > > Availability NO is used when it is not possible to activate transport
> > > > because it is unsupported (e.g. A2DP not connected or when bluez does
> > > > not support profile switching).
> > > > 
> > > > > so now we have to set the initial transport to playing
> > > > 
> > > > How it should help? I do not see reason now...
> > > > 
> > > > Anyway, I was not able to reproduce your problem, basically I always had
> > > > availability for activated profile set to YES.
> > > 
> > > Now I see it. PA_AVAILABLE_YES is returned only for
> > > PA_BLUETOOTH_TRANSPORT_STATE_PLAYING.
> > > 
> > > So for PA_BLUETOOTH_TRANSPORT_STATE_IDLE we also get
> > > PA_AVAILABLE_UNKNOWN and therefore module-bluetooth-policy does not know
> > > which transport is activated.
> > > 
> > > Cannot we get transport state in module-bluetooth-policy? Seems that
> > > this is the right direction.
> > 
> > Currently we have following mapping:
> > 
> > PA_BLUETOOTH_TRANSPORT_STATE_DISCONNECTED --> PA_AVAILABLE_NO
> > PA_BLUETOOTH_TRANSPORT_STATE_PLAYING --> PA_AVAILABLE_YES
> > PA_BLUETOOTH_TRANSPORT_STATE_IDLE --> PA_AVAILABLE_UNKNOWN
> > 
> > Plus PA_AVAILABLE_NO is changed to PA_AVAILABLE_UNKNOWN when pulseaudio
> > can activate that transport via bluez codec switch API as described
> > above.
> > 
> > PA_PORT_AVAILABLE_YES is defined as:
> > This port is available, likely because the jack is plugged in.
> > 
> > PA_PORT_AVAILABLE_NO as:
> > This port is not available, likely because the jack is not plugged in.
> > 
> > And PA_PORT_AVAILABLE_UNKNOWN as:
> > This port does not support jack detection
> > 
> > Seems that PA code and applications skips profiles with PA_AVAILABLE_NO
> > and do not allow to use it. So above change to PA_AVAILABLE_UNKNOWN
> > seems like a good idea.
> > 
> > But why idle/suspended transports have PA_AVAILABLE_UNKNOWN? Should not
> > it be PA_AVAILABLE_YES? Because transport is activated and can be used.
> > It is known that connection is working.
> 
> If I recall correctly, that's because opening the audio link may fail
> even if the profile is connected. I think a device can have connections
> established with multiple other devices simultaneously, but it might
> not be able to stream audio with more than one device at a time.

Hm.. This is a good point. So it is better to not touch availability.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Reply via email to