Thanks for the replies on this. On Sep 30, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Or if these values are unknown, should I just tool around and keep >> reducing >> the amount pre-allocated until the audio stack fails? > > Why would you want to do that? Well if you have an embedded system with a limited amount of flash, and main RAM (compared to an x86 desktop) then an allocation of that size does have an impact, so I was looking for ways to slim it down a little. That's the main reason. But if this is a good size even for embedded, then so be it. For x86 this is a flea on a dogs back, for embedded it's a little more noticeable. But not a show stopper. Thanks! Nick _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
