On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 06:18:15PM EST, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Luke Yelavich at 12/06/09 03:13 did gyre and gimble: > >>> So I've pushed the branch "0.9.15-branch" to my own git clone: >>> http://colin.guthr.ie/git/pulseaudio/log/?h=0.9.15-branch >> >> This branch/tree appears not to have any tags, which makes it difficult to >> work out which commit was the last commit for the 0.9.15 release. I managed >> to work it out by checking the tag in the mainline pulse branch, and using >> that as a base to pull patches, however it seems a couple of patches do not >> apply cleanly. I found that commit 758aac63b97d6f5a3a6a5d74d7d0af12cd46cd3d >> and commit dce6af5fefbcd68d52f6ff42509213406f62c57f had hunks that failed to >> apply. The first patch I used was commit >> 4f2a3cb6019d551ca98aa2034854985df2670a30. >> >> Have I missed something? > > Oh right I forgot to push the tags... I'll do that now :) I was hoping > Lennart would pull the branch TBH but never mind. > > I'll push the v0.9.15 tag now.
The extra patches you have added to your branch do not all apply against a freshly downloaded and unpacked pulseaudio tarball, as I indicated in my previous email. I think I listed at least a couple of the commits in my last email, but I think there may be one more, commit 7e664dc56a1f2ce385f6f7739209ef2413974d8f. I've tried fixing the patches, but the code is somewhat different for one patch, which is why it doesn't apply. Luke _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
