On Wed, 21.10.09 13:43, Alvaro Alonso Jiménez ([email protected]) wrote:
> You mean that when having silence, since there is no change, there is no > necessity to be updating the content of the output stream, don't > you??? No? All I am saying is that we dynamically scale the wakeup intervals (and hence block sizes) based on the demands of the clients. > And if so, is there any way of modifying this?? I have been looking > into the source code, but I am not able to locate where to configure > this block size so it will not make difference between the cases of > having silence and having sound. http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/LatencyControl Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
