Hi,
I recently submitted two patches for ALSA kernel stack that
will guarantee wake_ups to happen at each periodic interrupt.
Currently that is not the case when avail_min is greater than
period size.
The patch doesn't seem to cause regression but might break
applications that depend on non-standard use of ALSA API.
Takashi Iwai noted that PulseAudio might complain about the change
(not that PulseAudio use non-standard methods).
Could someone please confirm if the two patches might cause regression
for PulseAudio? Here are the links..
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2009-December/023986.html
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2009-December/023985.html
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
