Are we talking about the same sinks here? I mean there should be one Alsa sink
(the physical digital output) ie. reduce Alsa to a driver providing only
hardware sinks, not software sinks (like rate converters, A52 etc.).
On the Pulseaudio side, two profiles using that one Alsa digital sink is fine.
I
don't have any preference about the Pulseaudio side - I just don't think a user
should have to configure a .asoundrc with additional software sinks for Alsa.
If the profile changing is such that the user cannot tell the difference
between
a change between 2 sound cards and a change between A52 and stereo on a single
digital output, then that's fine.
Cheers,
Mike
________________________________
From: Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi>
To: pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
Sent: Mon, 12 July, 2010 20:27:28
Subject: Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] {PATCH][RFC] AC3 passthrough support
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 19:25 +0000, Michael Rans wrote:
> Frankly, I think it would be much better to have A52 in Pulseaudio
> with switchable channel maps so that there's one sink.
Why is it so important to have only one sink? What's wrong with changing
profiles?
--
Tanu Kaskinen
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
