Daniel Chen <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:32 AM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >> I also have no idea about Maverick at all, and how it would cater for >> the Hammerfall with regard to Pulseaudio, defaults and so on. > > The modifications that you made would still be necessary in Maverick. > > >> Would it be considered useful if I made the jump to Maverick prerelease >> right now? Who will then be doing the testing for a putative backport? > > My opinion is that it isn't absolutely necessary to move to Maverick > (I dogfood the LTS releases). All the modifications that I suggested > are possible in Lucid, too. It's probable that [Launchpad's] > ~ubuntu-audio-dev will have a staging PulseAudio package (based on > Maverick's) for Lucid soon.
The recipe can slightly be improved using amixer -D hw:DSP cset 'iface=CARD,name=Precise Pointer' On since that would be more symbolical and would likely do nothing to cards not in possession of such a control. I did some more experiments, and Flash Video continues to have skips. However, the previous artifacts sounded like wraparounds. The current ones apparently correspond to skipped frames. I have no idea why Flash would skip frames when there seems to be enough buffer of original content available, but maybe the codecs don't keep up. Right now I have a hard time convincing firefox/pulseaudio to try the builtin sound card for comparison. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
