On 2011-01-31 12:41, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 31/01/11 10:46 did gyre and gimble:
On 2011-01-31 10:41, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Thanks for the update David :)
You're welcome :-)
PulseAudio #1 and #2: I believe these should be applied to PulseAudio
upstream.
OK, I think you've given it sufficient testing and exposer to confirm
this. Can I just ask if these are "safe" if the corresponding gst fixes
are not committed? (i.e. will GST generally bork or should it cope as
well as currently without it's patches?)
Both are optimisations - gst patch only will be better than no patch at
all, and PA patch only will be better than no patch at all. Most people
will see it solved by either patch, but I guess that there are machines
so slow that you'll need both.
No worries, just wanted to make sure that it wasn't a "paired" updated -
e.g. the PA commits *required* the GST ones (I figured it was very
unlikely but with the Skype issue on the third patch, I figured I'd be
safer ask!)
Also, master only or master+s-q
(I'm personally favouring the latter).
Me too.
OK, applied to my tree now with a tiny modification due to Lennart's
rate limit patch on s-q which I've now merged to master (with updates
for additional calls).
Will push once I've done a few more bits and bobs.
Thanks :-) This, and that Takashi agreed to take my ALSA patch in 2.6.38
as well (totally unrelated), this might actually turn out to be a really
good day! :-)
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
http://launchpad.net/~diwic
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
