On Mar 20, 2011 7:15 PM, "Colin Guthrie" <gm...@colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
>
> 'Twas brillig, and Daniel Mack at 20/03/11 17:39 did gyre and gimble:
> > From: Daniel Mack <dan...@caiaq.de>
> >
> > This would have crashed when unloading the module.
> > ---
> > src/modules/coreaudio/module-coreaudio-detect.c | 5 +----
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/modules/coreaudio/module-coreaudio-detect.c
b/src/modules/coreaudio/module-coreaudio-detect.c
> > index 1d26b84..fda1f17 100644
> > --- a/src/modules/coreaudio/module-coreaudio-detect.c
> > +++ b/src/modules/coreaudio/module-coreaudio-detect.c
> > @@ -231,13 +231,10 @@ fail:
> > }
> >
> > void pa__done(pa_module *m) {
> > - struct userdata *u;
> > + struct userdata *u = m->userdata;
> > struct ca_device *dev = u->devices;
> > AudioObjectPropertyAddress property_address;
> >
> > - pa_assert(m);
> > - pa_assert_se(u = m->userdata);
> > -
> > property_address.mSelector = kAudioHardwarePropertyDevices;
> > property_address.mScope = kAudioObjectPropertyScopeGlobal;
> > property_address.mElement = kAudioObjectPropertyElementMaster;
>
> From what I can see, most modules are still calling pa_assert(m) so it's
> probably better to keep the assert in there and just move the dev =
> u->devices line lower.
>
> Other than that the other patches are all fine.
Ok, can you add it back and amend the patch? I think that would be easier
than resending :-)
Thanks,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
