Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 11:56 +0530 schrieb Arun Raghavan: > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 00:06 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> [...] > > I guess it has something to do with > > > > commit 4cd90d9e32ca9a23e3c0f7615974ea0c55ff3e49 > > Author: Arun Raghavan <arun.ragha...@collabora.co.uk> > > Date: Mon Oct 25 17:59:08 2010 +0100 > > > > volume: Add Orc-based optimised volume scaling > > > > This adds volume scaling for 1- and 2-channel software volume > > scaling > > using Orc. While testing the MMX and SSE backends on a Core2, I > > see an > > ~2x performance benefit over the hand-rolled MMX and SSE code. > > Since I > > haven't been able to test on other architectures, the Orc code > > is only > > used when MMX/SSE* is present. This can be changed in the > > future after > > testing on AMD and ARM machines. > > > > but I do not know anything about this. > > > > I am using OpenEmbedded with `minimal` or `minimal-uclibc` for `MACHINE > > = "at91sam9260ek"`. ORCC 0.4.9 is used on this system. > > Could you try with Orc 0.4.10? Unfortunately, I don't have a quick way > to downgrade my local Orc version to verify? I verified that it works with Orc 0.4.10. > If this is not possible, we > can just bump the patch to 0.4.11, which was released a while ago (and > is what I'm using). You send the patch today and it was already pushed in f49711c9 [1]. > BTW, for 0.9.22 and current stable-queue, the Orc stuff will not get > used for anything on ARM. Understood. Thanks, Paul [1] http://git.0pointer.de/?p=pulseaudio.git;a=commit;h=f49711c99a86075de0a2337c4ea71049a9aa146a
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
