Issue #2087 has been updated by martin.
I don't think it is a Solaris specific thing, but as I don't have any other systems I can't verify :) What happens if you in Linux define a service which isn't installed, and request that that it should be "stopped"? ---------------------------------------- Feature #2087: Not installed is the same as not running http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2087 Author: martin Status: Needs design decision Priority: Low Assigned to: martin Category: service Target version: unplanned Complexity: Unknown Affected version: 0.24.7 Keywords: Service should not complain if it should be disabled, but is missing: Tue Mar 17 00:23:32 -0700 2009 Service[rpc-100235](provider=smf) (warning): Could not get status on service svc:/network/rpc-100235_1/rpc_ticotsord:default An alternative would be to add a new parameter service { "svc:/network/rpc-100235_1/rpc_ticotsord:default": ensure => stopped, ismissing => warn } ---------------------------------------- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://reductivelabs.com/redmine/my/account --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
