Issue #2239 has been updated by Todd Zullinger.

Luke, do you think for 0.25.0 it might be worth _not_ attempting to restart on 
SIGHUP, since that just ends up killing puppetmasterd?  If coding that is too 
invasive, would a patch to the puppet.conf man page section on Signals which 
notes that puppetmasterd does not restart on HUP be acceptable?  (I can do the 
latter, while the former is probably not something I should attempt. ;)
----------------------------------------
Feature #2239: TERM signal should cause puppetd to exit as quickly as possible
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2239

Author: Luke Kanies
Status: Accepted
Priority: High
Assigned to: Luke Kanies
Category: transactions
Target version: 0.26.0
Complexity: Unknown
Affected version: 0.24.8
Keywords: 


Currently, if puppetd receives either a TERM or an INT, it will finish its 
transaction before exiting.

This can result in a too-long delay.  Instead, one or both of these signals 
should cause Puppet to only finish the resource it's working on and then exit.


-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, 
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: 
http://reductivelabs.com/redmine/my/account

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Bugs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to