Issue #2479 has been updated by Nigel Kersten.

So while I agree with the sentiment, I'm not so sure I think this kind of 
naming schemea is the best solution.

It definitely feels like puppet and puppetd both don't need to exist, but it 
kind of bugs me how similar the following commands could end up being:

<pre>
puppet --server foobar
puppet server
</pre>



----------------------------------------
Feature #2479: All functionality should be available from a single executable
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2479

Author: Luke Kanies
Status: Accepted
Priority: Normal
Assigned to: 
Category: executables
Target version: 0.26.0
Complexity: Unknown
Affected version: 0.24.8
Keywords: 


We currently have 9 executables, and their interfaces are understandably 
diverged.

We should copy the git folks and switch to a single executable ('puppet', of 
course), and then make each existing kind of functionality available via that 
executable.

I see the following areas:
<pre>
puppet ca # puppetca
puppet resource # ralsh
puppet server # puppetmasterd
puppet bucket # filebucket
puppet doc # puppetdoc and pi, i think
puppet agent # puppetd
puppet queue # puppetqd
puppet trigger # puppetrun
</pre>


-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, 
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: 
http://reductivelabs.com/redmine/my/account

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Bugs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to