Issue #1643 has been updated by Maciej Bliziński.
To add a bit more of complexity, apart from pkg-get, there's also pkgutil, in which I'd be more interested than in pkg-get. It understands the catalogs used by OpenCSW and Blastwave. ---------------------------------------- Bug #1643: package providers "sunfreeware" and "blastwave" inappropriate: should be pkgget http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1643 Author: Philip Brown Status: Needs design decision Priority: Normal Assigned to: Andrew Shafer Category: package Target version: unplanned Affected version: 0.24.4 Keywords: Branch: I've noticed that you have two separate "package providers": puppet/provider/package/sunfreeware.rb puppet/provider/package/blastwave.rb This doesnt make sense, since the actual package mechanism is "pkg-get", and is common to both of them. Just as you provide a "dpkg" provider, it seems most appropriate that you should provide a "pkgget" provider. Additionally, as the author of pkg-get, I take exception to the description in "blastwave.rb", describing it as "Blastwave's pkg-get". It does not belong to blastwave. pkg-get belongs to me, specifically. Would you please remove both the sunfreeware.rb and blastwave.rb providers, and replace them with a generic "pkgget" or "pkg-get" provider file? a sample version (untested) is provided. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://reductivelabs.com/redmine/my/account --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
