Issue #1919 has been updated by Bret McMillan.
James Turnbull wrote: > Hi Bret - can you clarify exactly what sort of value(s) you expect the fact > to return? Thanks. This post seems to be about as good as any summary of the needs of various distros: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/2009-November/006227.html lsb_release might be something worth checking out, too. ---------------------------------------- Feature #1919: Please have facter provide something other than arch to distinguish /usr/lib vs /usr/lib64, etc. http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1919 Author: Bret McMillan Status: Needs more information Priority: Normal Assigned to: Category: library Target version: 1.5.8 Keywords: facter lib lib64 Branch: On x86_64 machines, it'd be very useful to simulate something like RPM's %{_lib} macro, which will "do the right thing"... it's 'lib' on i386 machines and 'lib64' on x86_64 machines, etc. I could write my own based off of 'architecture' from facter, but this seems like a potentially common enough that having facter just provide it from upstream would be a good thing. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://reductivelabs.com/redmine/my/account--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.
