Issue #5259 has been updated by Daniel Pittman.

Felix Frank wrote:
> eric sorenson wrote:
> > Feel free to reject this if it's unrelated, but this came up on the mailing 
> > list today - it would be great if, whatever the nomenclature ends up being 
> > (I like "title"), the value is accessible as a local variable inside a 
> > resource.  I.e. this doesn't work, and it really ought to:
> 
> I disagree. Spawning a variable that is used in the scope of the resource 
> declaration, but is otherwise not defined in said scope, is bound to lead to 
> confusion and compatibility issues.

The "name" variable already has a conflict in the scope; an example of the 
problem would be:

    define foo () { file { "/tmp/example": source => "puppet:///$name" } }

That said, I *really* think it would be worth the pain and suffering to change 
that now and have $name be "the current resource" rather than "the enclosing 
define", since that is considerably more commonly used.

----------------------------------------
Bug #5259: Synonyms (title, namevar, name) make it confusing.
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/5259

Author: Jordan Sissel
Status: Accepted
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 
Affected Puppet version: 
Keywords: consistency usability
Branch: 


* If you're querying a resource, it's Someresource <| title == ... |>
* If you're writing a provider, it's called a 'namevar'
* If you're implementing a custom define, it's called $name.

This is confusing and could benefit from unification, even if it's a small step 
such as unifying $name and title.


-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, 
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: 
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Bugs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.

Reply via email to