Issue #7241 has been updated by Jeremy Huntwork.
Stefan Schulte wrote: > There already is ;-) Try the [`membership` parameter][1] Ah nice, I missed that one. Thanks for the tip. ---------------------------------------- Feature #7241: Group membership should be a type of its own. https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7241 Author: Nigel Kersten Status: Accepted Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: Telly Affected Puppet version: Keywords: Branch: It's very difficult right now to express declarative statements like: * Ensure this user is not in this group, leave it alone otherwise * Ensure this user is in this group without defining the user, leave it alone otherwise. I propose that we move group membership to a type of its own. That would also allow us to abstract away the differences between different platforms, some of which consider membership to be an attribute of the group, some of which consider it to be an attribute of the user. It would allow us to remove all the "authoritative" settings for user/group membership, as they would move to this type instead. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.
