I think we should as its the way most Ruby developers ship libraries about. Whether I like that or not. :) On Jan 10, 2012 3:10 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Issue #7788 has been updated by Nigel Kersten. > > > Given we’re integrating ‘puppet module’ into Puppet, and assuming that > we’re actually going to fulfill our promise to make it easy to distribute > all the kinds of Puppet extension points (faces, facts, lib/whatever, > providers) via modules, I’d love to get feedback from people on this ticket > as to whether they think we really should deliver this functionality? > ------------------------------ > Feature #7788: Puppet should allow rubygems to deliver new > functionality<https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7788> > > - Author: R.I. Pienaar > - Status: Code Insufficient > - Priority: Normal > - Assignee: Nigel Kersten > - Category: plug-ins > - Target version: 2.7.x > - Affected Puppet version: > - Keywords: > - Branch: ripienaar/feature/master/7788 > > It would be desirable to use Rubygems to install things like parser > functions. > > There might be cases where you only want a function on the master, > pluginsync would copy it everywhere and everywhere might not have the > dependencies needed to run it. > > If the autoloader considered the rubygem search path while autoloading > this should allow gems to extend puppet. > ------------------------------ > > You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to > it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please > click here: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.
