Issue #15911 has been updated by Charlie Sharpsteen.

Status changed from Investigating to In Topic Branch Pending Review
Assignee deleted (Charlie Sharpsteen)
Branch set to https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/pull/1518

Thanks a bunch for the pull request Robert!
----------------------------------------
Feature #15911: automatic .service suffix for the systemd provider to keep 
service names consistent
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/15911#change-84537

Author: Robert Kennedy
Status: In Topic Branch Pending Review
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: service
Target version: 
Affected Puppet version: 
Keywords: systemd
Branch: https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/pull/1518


I'd like to be able to be able to have a mix of systemd and redhat systems that 
run the same named services. Currently it seems I have to resort to
<pre>
 $snmpservicename = $snmpserviceprovider ? {
    "systemd" => "snmpd.service",
    "redhat"    => "snmpd",
}

service { "$snmpservicename":
    provider => "$snmpserviceprovider",
    etc.
}
</pre>

I would much rather choose the provider for my system and be able to refer to 
the snmpd service with the same name across hosts with different providers if 
possible. I believe everything that puppet would want to handle as a Service 
would have a .service suffix. If you think it would cause too much confusion 
due to the assumption of service naming, I can continue to do what I'm doing.


-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, 
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: 
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to