Issue #21497 has been reported by Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse.
----------------------------------------
Feature #21497: OpenBSD: add encrypted swap fact
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/21497
* Author: Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
* Status: Unreviewed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
* Keywords: facter, openbsd, swap
* Branch:
* Affected Facter version:
----------------------------------------
Hi,
Here's a patch that we've had in OpenBSD ports for a while, which checks if the
swap is encrypted.
It's been working fine in practice, but I'm having some issues writing a test
for this so I could
properly submit it here...
Running the spec test results in:
5) Memory facts on OpenBSD should return whether swap is encrypted
Failure/Error: Facter.fact(:swapencrypted).value.should == true
Mocha::ExpectationError:
unexpected invocation: Facter::Util::Resolution.exec('uname -s')
satisfied expectations:
- allowed any number of times, not yet invoked:
#<AnyInstance:Facter::Util::Loader>.load_all(any_parameters)
- allowed any number of times, invoked 15 times:
#<Facter::Util::Fact:0x4599ae7fc00>.value(any_parameters)
- allowed any number of times, not yet invoked:
Facter::Util::Resolution.exec('sysctl -n vm.swapencrypt.enable')
- allowed any number of times, not yet invoked:
Facter::Util::Resolution.exec('sysctl -n hw.physmem')
- allowed any number of times, not yet invoked:
Facter::Util::Resolution.exec('vmstat')
- allowed any number of times, not yet invoked:
Facter::Util::Resolution.exec('swapctl -s')
# ./lib/facter/kernel.rb:19:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./lib/facter/util/resolution.rb:459:in `call'
# ./lib/facter/util/resolution.rb:459:in `block in value'
# ./lib/facter/util/resolution.rb:457:in `value'
# ./lib/facter/util/resolution.rb:442:in `to_s'
# ./lib/facter/memory.rb:89:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./lib/facter/util/resolution.rb:459:in `call'
# ./lib/facter/util/resolution.rb:459:in `block in value'
# ./lib/facter/util/resolution.rb:457:in `value'
# ./lib/facter/util/fact.rb:137:in `block in find_first_real_value'
# ./lib/facter/util/fact.rb:136:in `each'
# ./lib/facter/util/fact.rb:136:in `find_first_real_value'
# ./lib/facter/util/fact.rb:97:in `block in value'
# ./lib/facter/util/fact.rb:121:in `searching'
# ./lib/facter/util/fact.rb:94:in `value'
# ./spec/unit/memory_spec.rb:214:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>
My diff is at:
https://github.com/jasperla/facter/commit/2afc223a97680264cd34e9f1835984deac3a23c5
(On an unrelated note, sysctl -n does what the cut(1) magic was doing for
hw.physmem.)
If someone could help me sort out the spec test, I'll turn the aforementioned
commit into a proper pull request.
Thanks.
--
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it,
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
