On May 20, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 03:59:12PM -0500, Luke Kanies wrote: >> >> On May 9, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Marcin Owsiany wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure about the exact syntax, but I do think that there >>> should be >>> a "sticky" relation feature (possibly with another feature to >>> "unstick" >>> that). >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> >> I definitely want something like this feature -- I think I filed it >> as >> an enhancement request a while ago. > > Was that #1088 ? (I'll put a cross-reference to this thread there if > that is the one).
Either that[1] or more generally #448, which posits a special syntax just for creating relationships. Obviously the latter is harder, but it's pretty clear that relationships are a special cross-resource feature, so they should probably be something supported directly by the language rather than hackishly using attributes. 1 - http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/ticket/1088 2 - http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/ticket/448 -- There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
