On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 07:52 +1000, James Turnbull wrote:
> Brice Figureau wrote:
> > This path adds a service provider to manage daemontools[1]
> > services directly from puppet.
> > 
> > The daemons directories should be placed in /var/lib/service
> > (overridable with the service path parameter).
> > When the service is enabled, the daemon directory is symlinked 
> > into the service directory which defaults to /service 
> > (or /etc/service on debian). The daemon is then started by svscan.
> > Services are disabled by removing this symlink.
> > Start and stop are almost directly mapped to enable/disable.
> > This provider supports restart and status directly
> > 
> 
> Brice
> 
> For a new provider we really also need tests.
> 
> See for RSpec:
> 
> spec/unit/provider
> 
> or for the older Unit tests:
> 
> test/ral/providers/service/

OK, I had a look to those.
I have some questions:
 * should I implement both tests (ie in ral and Rspec)? or Rspec is
enough?
 * there is no service test in the Rspec part (except one in the
integration directory), or did I missed something?

I think I'll do something along the lines of
spec/unit/provider/package/hpux.rb but adapted to my service (ie check
that the commands issued are the good ones and that the object
implements all the necessary methods)

Will that be enough?
Thanks,
-- 
Brice Figureau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to