On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 13:36 -0400, Sean E. Millichamp wrote: > That is a good point, I suspect it will. Maybe I should try that first. > The original patch the work was based on used the command line tools and > I decided I wanted to keep using the command line tools to allow support > on systems that (for whatever reason) didn't (or, couldn't easily) have > the ruby-selinux bindings installed.
At least for Fedora/RHEL, I'd be more than happy to add a dependency to the puppet package so that puppet clients there will always have ruby-selinux. > In any event, given the complexities Luke brought to light, I don't > think it is reasonable to try to include either caching or the ruby > libselinux bindings in 0.24.6 (given the intended release schedule). Yeah, probably too late for 0.24.6; would be nonetheless very useful. David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
