On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 18:33 -0500, Luke Kanies wrote: > On Oct 20, 2008, at 8:47 AM, Brice Figureau wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 14:26 -0500, Luke Kanies wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> It strikes me that you are the perfet person to add inline > >> documentation. :) > > > > Maybe... It depends on what you mean by "inline documentation". I'm > > not > > usually that good with documentation (be it for user or > > specifications). > > This wouldn't be writing it -- it'd be extracting it. :)
Ahhhh, OK. That sounds pretty interesting. > > > >> I'll add a ticket for it today, and you can see whether you feel like > >> tackling it. > > > > I didn't see the ticket, did you forget to add it? > > D'oh - http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/show/1664. I'm volunteering for this. I'll assign the ticket to myself, if nobody else wants it. Maybe we could tell rdoc to use the Puppet parser (with some kind of glue), and map puppet "language structures" to ruby structures (ie modules -> modules, class -> class, define -> methods) and use rdoc to perform the text->html conversion and at the same time the html structure? I guess I have to study rdoc and other alternatives... I'll keep the list posted with my progress and findings. -- Brice Figureau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
