Blake Barnett wrote: > Hi Manish, > > You should look at the way David Schmitt modeled collectd[1], it could > be done in a similar way for monit. Honestly though, I would love to > see more abstract types created for "monitoring" and/or "statistics". > I am not so sure about this. I can see broad groupings - a separate MRTG and Cacti type for example wouldn't make much sense to me - but Nagios, Zenoss and OpenNMS would seem sufficiently different to me to merit separate types/providers - as you can see from the complexity in the existing Nagios types. > I'd hate to see more types created for specific monitoring and stats > packages, there are FAR too many of them out there. What we really > want to be able to do is configure them for the basics across nodes. > The corner cases can be handled by the more generic mechanisms in > puppet. > Are there heaps? I know of David's modules, the Nagios types. If there are others I'd love to know about them.
Cheers James --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
