On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Paul Nasrat <pnas...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> Another bug I imagine... ? >> >> Yes I think so, file a bug against ralsh, as it probably should behave >> as puppet in regards to fact loading. Particularly if we want to >> encourage people to sanity check their stuff through it. > > Yep. Just filed as: http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1962
So I'm happy (and would prefer) to switch to using the fact assuming the ralsh patch is simple enough. I'm just not quite sure whether ralsh not loading facts is a symptom of a deeper problem, or whether simply adding the call to ralsh is the best way to go, so waiting on direction there before I go modifying things. -- Nigel Kersten Systems Administrator Tech Lead - MacOps --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
