Luke Kanies wrote: > > Yes, that's the right approach. I'd like Facter under the LGPL, but > I haven't tracked the license file changes enough to know what > happened when. > > I'll get it all figured out and straightened up next week. > > > I clearly didn't actually get it all straightened out that week. > > Anyone opposed to just accepting Todd's patch? >
No issue from me. Regards James Turnbull -- Author of: * Pro Linux Systems Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
