Nigel Kersten wrote: > So I was thinking that if all of us maintainers come up with > packages for puppet 0.25.0-rc1, that would hugely increase the > number of users testing it.... > > which led me to think that we might need a puppet-maintainers list? > I mean we can co-ordinate on the puppet-dev list if people prefer, > but I can see some benefits in having a targeted list. > > It would be great if we could get everything in order so that we > always have release candidate packages available. Our .0 releases > should be much better then...
Feel free to subscribe me for any list created for this purpose, if we end up wanting/needing one. I don't have any strong opinion on whether we need a separate list or if puppet-dev is suitable. I think I lean slightly to keeping things here, but then, I've generally had enough time to follow this list. I realize many maintainer might not. Perhaps just adding a [MAINTAINERS] tag to the subject of package related mail would suffice to let busier maintainers keep up? (I'm working on 0.25.0rc1 packages for Fedora/RHEL/CentOS today. I'll post a reply to the announce mail when I get those finished and posted to my repo.) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The things most people want to know are usually none of their business.
pgpSzfUgMYbzX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
