On 7/08/09 18:56, Luke Kanies wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Markus wrote:
> 
>>> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 22:53 -0700, Luke Kanies wrote:
>>>> It's a bit unclear from this patch, but I don't think we're  
>>>> downcasing
>>>> on the hashing side, either, so unless everyone declares the  
>>>> hostnames
>>>> as lower-case, this still won't work.
>> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 09:20 +0200, Brice Figureau wrote:
>>> Are you sure?
>> I'm not sure either way (Luke may be though).  On the hypotheses that
>> this was a regression I found where in the chain the case-behavior had
>> changed.  I didn't find anywhere that the hash key case would have
>> changed, so (by my hypothesis) that wasn't the problem.
> 
> I'm not sure about this, but I figured it was the case.  I could  
> easily be wrong.
> 
>> That leaves several possibilities:
>>
>>     1. Hash key casing did change, and I just didn't find it.
>>     2. The underlying hash implementation changed (e.g. older versions
>>        had used some flavour of indifferent hash)
>>     3. The regression hypothesis is wrong, and there is a long lived
>>        but heretofore unnoticed bug
>>     4. The proposed fix is sufficient
>>
>> The third alternative is more plausible than it might seem, since by  
>> my
>> reading it doesn't require all lower case names, just _consistent_
>> capitalization, if neither the keys added and the keys used as probes
>> are downcased.
> 
> I'd say if we have an integration test that has a capitalized node  
> name that can be found via a differently-cased search, then I'd  
> consider that sufficient proof that it works.

Why are you talking about node names, when the bug report is about class 
names which doesn't look like node names to me :-) ?

-- 
Brice Figureau
My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to