On 11/08/09 2:43, Luke Kanies wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 3:16 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
> 
>> Hi all
>>
>> I just wanted to query consider its getting close how we planned to
>> manage Git after 0.25.0.  My plan (and obviously open to input and  
>> Luke
>> has a different view, etc, etc, :)) was:
>>
>> Branch master to 0.25.x.  The 0.25.x branch continue on as the home  
>> for
>> fixes for the 0.25.x releases - .1, .2, etc.  The master branch would
>> remain "development" as such and would be targeted at 0.26.0.
>>
>> We would merge in fixes back and forth when required from master and  
>> 0.25.x.
>>
>> Thoughts? Doctrinal arguments?
> 
> IMO, 'master' should always be the branch we expect people to submit  
> code against, which to me means stable.

I'm not sure that we have the same definition of stable.
For me stable means doesn't move forward, has no new features but only 
critical bug fixes (ie the debian definition of stable).
And I'm not sure it's a good idea to have people committing against this 
branch, we'll risk to have no new features ever :-)

But if you mean stable as a byproduct of the next branch in which we'll 
merge the new features, then we certainly agree.

> I think we should move to the often-recreated 'next' branch as we  
> discussed, probably with an additional 'dev' branch, so we can try  
> code out in one of these branches for a while and remove it if it  
> doesn't work (without having to revoke code).

I like this plan, the question is how much burden it will add on James 
shoulders? which we should compare to the benefits.

Anyway, I'll adapt my work to the chosen scheme :-)
-- 
Brice Figureau
My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to