On Aug 11, 2009, at 1:43 AM, Paul Nasrat wrote: > > 2009/8/11 Andrew Shafer <[email protected]>: >> >> It was failing because I took James advice to run it as root. >> >> So it was always writable... > > It'd be nice to have a post 0.25.x push to try make the tests less > brittle. I know there are some oddities in ordering but I've tracked > those down by bisection before, it may be possible. Also getting the > hudson builds to run on each push would be great to spot integration > issues early. I guess this means moving it off James' credit card :)
The big problem here is just having the bandwidth to track down all of the failing tests. I've tried it and had some success before, but I've had just as much failure. One of the main things Markus is doing right now is getting the tests in order, though, so this should get much better over the course of the next month. I wouldn't say that 0.25 has any dependency on this, though. -- Tradition is what you resort to when you don't have the time or the money to do it right. -- Kurt Herbert Alder --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
