On Sep 16, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Rein Henrichs wrote:

> Hello,
>
> As I'm sure you're all aware, are two basic tensions in release  
> management: Pick a set of features, or pick a deadline. We seem to  
> be in agreement for the release strategy of major puppet releases  
> (we use the latter) but there is some advocacy on both sides for  
> smaller (point-point) releases.
>
> I would like to suggest compromise solution that we appear to be  
> converging on anyway: Mark certain tickets as release blockers, or  
> use a certain priority level (high or greater) as an ad-hoc  
> indicator that a ticket is blocking (per James); ensure that they  
> are fixed; and then include any other completed tickets when  
> packaging the release. This trades a certain amount of timeline  
> certainty for a greater certainty that these issues will be  
> addressed in the given release. This seems like a fair trade for  
> minor releases.
>
> Markus raised an objection to my use of the term "blocker" in a call  
> today, but it seems like the appropriate term to use for a ticket  
> that has otherwise been described as "show-stopping" or "really  
> should be fixed [for this release]". I'm also not married to this  
> term if swapping it out will help us arrive at a good solution.
>
> How does this feel to you folks?

Yeah, this is the best compromise position - default to a monthly or  
so point-point release, but allow wiggle room if there's a critical  
ticket that we think is solvable but hasn't quite yet been solved.

-- 
Wear the old coat and buy the new book. -- Austin Phelps
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to