On Sep 17, 2009, at 4:37 AM, David Schmitt wrote: > > Steven Jenkins wrote: >> Luke Kanies wrote: >>> I believe we'd essentially accepted these patches in review, right? >> >> I believe so, yes. >> >>> Seems like it should be stuck into 'ready for testing' and make it >>> into our nascent 'test' branch. >> >> That makes sense. As the discussion around behavior for various >> signals was >> rather lengthy and convoluted, I'd especially like DavidS and >> others who are >> wanting this behavior to give feedback on it. >> > > Is there any user-facing documentation for these changes? Some text > that > could go on the wiki would go a long way towards me being able to > understand[1] what functionality changes this patch brings...
Yes, there is a behaviour change that should be documented. It'll mostly affect the docs of the executables and the init scripts. Steven? -- The secret of being a bore is to tell everything. -- Voltaire --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
