On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:11 PM, James Turnbull wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Luke Kanies wrote: > >> I'm not entirely opposed to this idea of multiple node blocks >> matching, but it wouldn't happen for 0.25.1, and really, I think it >> probably makes more sense in an external node tool, as Brice >> suggests. >> > > I am a bit opposed as I see it as a serious step away from a KISS > principle and make it hard for people to trouble-shoot.
I want to agree, but I'm actually of mixed minds. It's a whole new level of functionality, something that actually make nodes truly useful. I've been getting the feeling recently that we haven't been keeping the language updated well enough with problems in the domain, so being more flexible about what problems we should be trying to solve can help resolve some of that. Any other opinions? -- Get forgiveness now -- tomorrow you may no longer feel guilty. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
