Apologies here; my email client decided to send the mail before I finished:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Steven Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > I've tried to not comment on this, but I'm failing, and I'll try real > hard not to rehash well-known examples, issues, and languages. > > Instead, would it be more Ruby-ish to monkeypatch the Object class: e.g., > > class Class > class Object def initialized? return defined? self and !self.nil end end Or some more user-friendly name, capturing the logical state you want to test on. Unfortunately, that's not quite legal Ruby, and I haven't thought through the issues around it. But the idea of providing a more readable check for a common idiom is a reasonable approach. Steven --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
