2009/10/21 Markus Roberts <[email protected]>: > Yeah, you would think. And you'd probably be right. But I'd started off > with a more aggressive change (rescue Object => detail) and printing the > class of detail. At this level it was coming back with an Errno::XXXXX > depending on what I'd done to disrupt thing. I scaled it back to this > minimal patch which causes all my test cases to work (they loop, as they > should). > > I am not thrilled with the patch as it stands, but I wanted to get something > out there for people to look at, talk about, and try while I cycled to > another problem for a bit. > >
So where are we on this? It looks a little ugly (I should know - pretty sure I've channeled that code at some point) but it's a bug fix not a refactor. I'm for pushing this. Regards James Turnbull -- Author of: * Pro Linux System Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
