Hi, On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:52:11PM -0600, Luke Kanies wrote: > On Nov 5, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Brice Figureau wrote: > > I think Evolution could work quite fine, because it doesn't wrap > > patches. If only Evolution was working on OSX. > > And actually mutt is pretty powerful :-) > > I agree mutt is powerful, I just don't want to use it. And really, > it's more the server-side technology: You have to use local mboxes > instead of remote IMAP mailboxes.
I just switched to mutt, and one of the requirements was that it should do IMAP, 'cause that's the only mailboxes I have. I have it setup to operate directly on my IMAP mailboxes, including Exchange and gmail and that is working just fine for me. Did you guys look at the just released tool gerrit for patch/review management ? From the release it looks like it's focus is on reviewing patches rather than managing sets of them. But it might be usable ? Regards, Ramon -- Teamlead System Engineering Hyves.nl e: [email protected] w: http://ramon71.hyves.nl Frederiksplein 42 1017 XN Amsterdam t +31 20 624 20 81 f +31 20 750 83 29
pgpaArN2SDibj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
