> > This gets you essentially everything you need, and all it says is: If > > you want multimaster, you have to have an inventorying node manager. > > But people running multi master mainly do this for failure resistance, > and we're just adding a single point of failure... Don't you think this > is a problem?
Yeah, that was my thought too. There are times when this is still reasonable (if you replace a complex, error prone single point of failure with one that is simpler and more reliable you're still ahead) but in general it's something you'd try to avoid. On the other other hand, it's quite possible that the node manager will be directly scalable (using, say, normal db replication) so this concern would go away. -- Markus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
