On Dec 1, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:

>
> This is a bit of an older thread, but I found it because I was  
> wandering
> through the archives trying to find an answer to my question:
>
> why specifically is rails 2.2.2 is a requirement for 0.25? The release
> notes[0] say:
>
>         Rails versions up to 2.3.x are now supported. Rails version
>         2.2.2 or greater is required.
>
> However, I cannot find anywhere that details why 2.2.2. Debian's  
> stable
> is at 2.1, and I'm wondering if installing 0.25.x on those stable
> systems is asking for a problem, if so what are those problems?

This is incorrect - 2.1 and later are supported, at least according to  
the Rails feature in the code, which should be the final arbiter.

> Luke Kanies <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> This is one of the things I hate most about the Rails community -- I
>> complain about it so loudly that some Rails dev friends of mine  
>> make a
>> shirt that says "I just put it in vendor!".
>
> I would love that shirt. I'm constantly fighting this battle and  
> having
> to re-explain why it is a bad thing, over and over again.
>
>> On May 13, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Nicholas E. Hubbard wrote:
>>
>>> I use puppet to manage my rails servers and can personally tell you
>>> it is a best practice with Rails applications to lock them to a
>>> specific version. This is because so much changes in the underlying
>>> versions.
>
> Not to open an old discussion, but saying 'best practice with Rails'
> does not give something much weight at all, there are a lot of best
> practices with Rails that are absurd and this is one of them.
>
>> Is there something about Rails discussions that suddenly makes people
>> top-reply? :)
>
> Or perhaps something about gmail, which encourages top-posting :(
>
>> Seems like we should either require an older version, or see if we  
>> can
>> support, say, 2.1-2.3.
>
> and then I did not see any more discussion of this. Is there any clear
> indication of why 2.2.2 was chosen somewhere?
>
> thanks!
> micah
>
>
> 0. http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ReleaseNotes
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> Groups "Puppet Developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected] 
> .
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en 
> .
>
>


-- 
Writing is not necessarily something to be ashamed of, but do it in
private and wash your hands afterwards. --Robert Heinlein
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.


Reply via email to