> Wouldn't it make more sense to do Puppet.features.ldap? at the top, > rather than the direct require?
I started to say I'm not sure I like doing feature bounding in a unit test, but that really is what's going on here. My next thought was to suggest pulling the mock class after we're done with it, but that gets messy too. *sigh* I guess I'd vote for Puppet.features.ldap? but none of them are perfect. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
